🔗 Share this article

Russia's monetary authority has stated it is seeking compensation valued at $230 billion from the securities depository Euroclear. This legal step represents a direct response from the Kremlin against plans to utilize immobilized Russian sovereign funds to support Ukraine.

The Legal Claim

Based on accounts in local news outlets, the central bank initiated a lawsuit last week for approximately 18 trillion roubles. This sum corresponds to the aforementioned $230 billion demand.

EU leaders will decide in the coming days on a proposal to use around €210 billion in frozen Russian state funds. This scheme entails granting Ukraine with a large loan to fund its military and economic stability.

The vast majority of these assets, totaling €185 billion, are held at the Euroclear clearing house in Brussels. This institution serves as the primary keeper for the Russian immobilised financial reserves.

Divergent Legal Views

EU authorities have maintained that their proposal is legally sound. They argue rests on the principle that title of the sovereign wealth still belongs to Russia, even though it was immobilized in European countries following the full-scale military offensive of Ukraine.

Moscow, in contrast, has labeled any use of the assets as illegal appropriation. Authorities have warned of retaliatory actions, including confiscating European private investors' assets within Russia.

The head of Russia's sovereign wealth fund, a figure who has taken on a prominent role in diplomatic talks, stated on X that Russia "will win in court" and retrieve its assets. He warned that the EU, the euro, and Euroclear "will face consequences" from the plan.

Strategic Positioning

With statements interpreted as an effort to drive a wedge between Europe and the United States, Dmitriev described the assets plan as "a vicious attack on property rights and the international reserves system created by the United States."

Euroclear declined to comment on the new legal action. It has in the past noted it is contending with more than 100 lawsuits in Russian jurisdictions.

Enforcement Challenges

While courts in EU countries are not expected to recognize rulings from Russian tribunals, analysts anticipate Moscow to seek enforcement in countries with stronger relations to the Kremlin.

"Russian monetary authorities may attempt to enforce a Russian legal ruling against Euroclear in countries such as China, Hong Kong, the UAE, Kazakhstan, and other sympathetic nations, provided that such holdings can be located," stated a legal expert from an NSP law firm.

European Safeguards

European authorities indicated they are working on measures to discourage other countries from aiding any Russian lawsuits against EU companies. Additionally, they are crafting protections to shield EU member states with investments in Russia from what they term "unlawful expropriation."

How the Funding Would Work

According to the detailed plan, the EU would issue an first €90 billion loan to Ukraine, using the proceeds earned from the immobilized assets at Euroclear. Importantly, Russia's ownership claim on the underlying funds would stay untouched.

Kyiv would only be obligated to return the money if and when Russia agreed to pay compensation for the vast destruction inflicted during the nearly four-year war.

Other Funding Ideas

The Belgian government, supported by Italy, Bulgaria, and Malta, has asked the EU to consider an alternative approach for funding Ukraine. This involves common EU debt issuance to fund a loan, using unused funds within the EU budget.

Such a proposal, however, requires full agreement among all 27 member states. The Hungarian government, considered friendly with the Kremlin, has previously expressed its opposition.

Commenting on Monday, the EU foreign policy chief, a senior official, described the proposed loan scheme as "the most credible solution" for aiding Ukraine. "This mechanism is secured against the Russian frozen assets, meaning it doesn't come from our taxpayers' money, which is also significant," she remarked. "Furthermore, it sends a clear signal that if you do all this destruction to another country, you must pay for the reparations."